Reckless driving charges are very serious issues because they lead to severe consequences, such as heavy fines, suspension of license, jail time, or even worse; in such cases, the most important decisions you will ever make will be hiring a reckless driving attorney who may offer you the expertise in challenging evidence presented against you, even reducing the charge or dismissing the charges. We explain how a reckless driving lawyer can represent you by denying the evidence presented, researching the methods they apply, and explaining why representation will be required in the event of reckless driving charges.
A) What is Reckless Driving?
A good beginning in discussing how a reckless driving lawyer could litigate evidence would involve knowing what constitutes reckless driving. By and large, the act of handling a vehicle with a willful disregard for other people's safety characterizes reckless driving. This includes speeding with excessive speed, tailgating, running red lights, or all forms of racing and weaving through traffic.
Charges of reckless driving are mostly based on a subjective interpretation of a driver's behavior. There is likely to be confusion and disagreement from law enforcement officers and witnesses regarding what constitutes reckless driving. That is where the expertise of a reckless driving lawyer comes in- they will analyze evidence and be able to point out inconsistencies, or in some cases, missteps made on your rights.
1) Challenging the Officer’s Observations:
In most reckless driving cases, the evidence against you will depend mostly on the observations of the officer that led to your arrest. Even if officers have been trained on dangerous driving behavior, their interpretation is subjective since it's left strictly to one's judgment. A reckless driving attorney will examine the officer's report and observe the validity of the officer's report. This can be any of the following:
i) Inconsistencies in Officer's Testimony:
If, in his report, there are inconsistencies or very vague descriptions regarding the actions you had taken, your lawyer can put that forward to weaken the case against you.
ii) Perception or Bias:
Policemen may make mistakes owing to their own perception or biases, assumptions, or narrow thinking about the accident. For example, one policeman might think fast driving in heavy traffic is reckless when the driver was trying not to have an accident.
iii) Lack of Probable Cause:
Probable cause must exist in order to stop and charge a defendant with reckless driving. In a case without any reasonable basis for stopping a vehicle, or issuing a citation under the circumstances, evidence could be excluded against you.
2) Scrutinizing Dashcam and Bodycam Footage:
Most police cars are fitted with in-car cameras, and police officers wear body cameras that record their encounters with motorists. This movie is, therefore, most likely to feature prominently in reckless driving cases. A lawyer trained in reckless driving shall carefully review the movie and identify some inconsistencies that might work to your advantage.
i) Dashcam Footage:
It could be apparent from the dash cam recording that the officer's description of dangerous driving is not true. For instance, your speed within the speed limit, or conditions on the road might have justified your action, like swerving to avoid an object.
ii) Bodycam Video:
The bodycam video may give an insight to the interactions by the officer with you and whether the officer acted according to procedure or not. If the officer made assumptions regarding your driving or acted inappropriately, then that could all go in your favor.
If the video is unclear or incomplete, a reckless lawyer may point out that the evidence will not convince the court beyond a reasonable doubt.
3) Questioning the Reliability of Eyewitness Testimony:
The case of reckless driving is highly implicated in eyewitness testimony, but still, one has to question one's reliance on most of the cases on it. People perceive matters based on emotions and bias or half-baked information. An attorney who practices or deals with reckless driving, therefore, must question and evaluate the veracity and authenticity of eyewitnesses.
i) Inconsistency in Witness Statements:
If there are many witnesses who say various different things regarding your driving, then such instances might raise a question regarding the credibility of the statements from such witnesses. Your attorney can point out the inconsistency to counter the prosecution's case.
ii) Bias or Motivated Testimony:
Often, the testifying witnesses have motives or reasons to exaggerate their testimony. For example, a competitor in a road race may testify that you were driving recklessly when you were not. A well-experienced attorney in reckless driving can question the credibility of such testimony.
Sometimes, your attorney may invoke the expert witnesses who would testify about the constraints on eyewitness testimony or a more realistic analysis of the situation.
4) Examining the Role of Road Conditions and Environmental Factors:
Most common charge of reckless driving arises from a driver's alleged failure to adapt to road conditions or environmental factors. It is very important, though, that people remember to distinguish the contribution of weather, road conditions, and so on, in the attitude and actions of a driver behind the wheel.
i) Poor Road Conditions:
If the road was poorly maintained with inadequate signage and presented an unexpected hazard - such as potholes or debris - these conditions could relate to your driving behavior. A reckless driving lawyer can plead that the road conditions played a significant role in the incident, so your responses were reasonable under those conditions.
ii) Weather Conditions:
Whether it had a heavy rain, fog, or ice, that can seriously affect the behavior of a person driving. If bad weather contributed to the case, your attorney would argue that your conduct was reasonable in order to protect you from danger rather than being reckless.
iii) Lack of adequate signposts:
In some cases, the driver gets barely alert or informed about the speed limit, changing the lane, or other hazards due to inadequate signposts. If that is really the case, your defense attorney can challenge the evidence by proving that the driver was reasonable in his actions due to the circumstances.
Environmental factors, a reckless driving attorney can highlight and bring into doubt your intent and behavior as well.
5) Challenging the Conclusions of Field Sobriety and Chemical Tests:
Field sobriety tests (FSTs) and chemical tests (such as a breath test) typically occur in conjunction with an impairment-related offense but may be used in a reckless driving case when impairment is in question. As long as you were submitted to such testing, your reckless driving attorney may argue that the procedures used for testing were defective.
i) Field Sobriety Test (FST) Reliability:
FST's tend to be subjective, and their test results could be significantly affected by many factors including: fatigue, stress, or a medical condition. Should the officer administering the test have made errors, either in terms of procedure or proper operation, your attorney is likely to offer various arguments regarding the results' reliability.
ii) Breathalyzer Test Accuracy:
Breath testing results can be flawed for several reasons, including a malfunctioning calibration or improper administration of the test, or some other medical condition. Your attorney will be able to question the accuracy of such tests if there was a malfunction and improper procedure involved in conducting the same.
If breath testing is a major part of the case against you, then your defense lawyer can effectively poke holes in the case of the prosecution by questioning the accuracy of the same.
6) Exploring Potential Defenses to Reckless Driving:
In addition to challenging evidence, a reckless driving attorney can make use of various legal defenses on your behalf to hopefully prevent you from being convicted. Some of the most common ones include:
i) Necessity Defense:
If you were driving in a manner that jurors might find reckless but that you had to do to avoid a greater danger (such as swerving to avoid a collision), your attorney may be able to argue that your actions were lawful under the circumstances.
ii) Misidentification:
Perhaps other people's actions were confused with yours, and your lawyer can present evidence showing that you were not related to the careless act.
iii) Lack of Intent:
Reckless driving involves a reckless disregard for safety; a lawyer can argue that your driving was not intentional or a mistake in judgment rather than being reckless.
The Final Words:
Reckless driving charges come with severe consequences, but a stalwart attorney for reckless driving can make all the difference for your case. Your attorney can argue against the evidence, question the officer's observations, dismantle dash cam footage, and break down eyewitness accounts to help identify flaws in the prosecution's case and have your charges lowered or possibly even dismissed completely.
If you are charged with reckless driving, do not delay seeking the advice of the best legal representative you can find. Representation by a good lawyer should be enough to stage a proper defense and ensure that your rights are protected throughout the course of such a process.
Write a comment